We did the draft together, but it was not implemented into Hyppopy yet.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Apr 26 2022
Apr 22 2022
Dec 20 2021
Jun 7 2021
May 10 2021
May 7 2021
In T28332#223158, @kleina wrote:I updated the draft in the branch directly (same file).
- I did not change the send/recv to scatter/gather. In my opinion send/recv makes more sense, but we can discuss this.
- In my opinion, we maybe don't need the "cleaning up" up the mpi_processes here, because it might be taken care of by our current implementation.
Let me know when you had time to look at it and if there are any questions. I'd like to discuss it a bit.
Could you point me to the commit? I cannot find it ?!?
Apr 22 2021
Apr 21 2021
Thanks
Your argument makes sense to me. I did not have a specific order in mind when implementing it, so I do not have any counterargument here.
Forgot something and didn't request review correctly. I will open this one agian.
Apr 19 2021
Apr 15 2021
I updated the draft in the branch directly (same file).
Apr 7 2021
I agree with the raised point. I checked the classes again and do not see a valid reason behind the blackbox_func call. I will fix this.
Mar 15 2021
Mar 13 2021
Mar 8 2021
Feb 24 2021
@kleina can ou review the branch somewhen if the change is OK?
Feb 23 2021
Feb 11 2021
That makes a lot of sense. I personally like the idea of a "optional dependency" better. I will have a look.
Feb 10 2021
Sep 7 2020
Sep 3 2020
Jan 16 2020
Nov 11 2019
May 22 2019
May 11 2019
Code coverage can be checked now.
And everything is setup up to use it with codecov.io
May 9 2019
May 8 2019
Apr 30 2019
Apr 5 2019
Apr 4 2019
Was too fast? Thought you might meant what I added. If you had something else in mind shall I reopen the task?
Uh oh, that was fast. ;)
I hadn't even made up my mind on that matter. My first purpose was to open up the discussion on that topic...
Apr 3 2019
What other aspects do you mean?