Page MenuHomePhabricator

wiesenfa (Manuel Wiesenfarth)
User

Projects

User Details

User Since
Mar 2 2020, 3:23 PM (13 w, 4 h)

Recent Activity

Thu, May 14

wiesenfa added a comment to T27396: Represent single-task challenge as multi-task challenge with one task.

Something important I think is also, that all plot functions work outside of the report as intended (it is desirable that users can also create their own reports). This includes choosing the correct function and giving an error if a function does not work with single tasks, e.g.

Thu, May 14, 2:25 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27396: Represent single-task challenge as multi-task challenge with one task.

Thanks.
In a single task situation, in practice a task will not have a name, so there should be no title and there should not be the need to set a task name I think....
I'll have a look at it, but please give me some time

Thu, May 14, 2:20 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27396: Represent single-task challenge as multi-task challenge with one task.

I think this should be well thought through before putting into action

Thu, May 14, 11:42 AM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa created T27420: report text.
Thu, May 14, 10:58 AM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27407: Warnings are shown in multi-task challenge report for violin plot.

it's not because of missing test cases. It is because in certain situation no Kendall can be computed. Don't use treat.na for this.

Thu, May 14, 10:53 AM · challengeR (v1.0)

Mon, May 11

wiesenfa added a comment to T27338: Report contains misleading information on missing values.

I agree, it would be nice if the actual number of NAs would be reported (together with the na.treat method) and not the number after na.treat which is then obviously 0.

Mon, May 11, 2:05 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27326: autolayout networks in multi task report ugly.

layouting (circle sizes, distances, font sizes, size of plot) needs to be automatically optimized which I failed so far

Mon, May 11, 2:04 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27385: Variables holding the aggregated value are named differently for single- and multi-task challenges.

Did you take care that FUN="mean" and FUN=mean is handled differently (in the former case it is a name, in the latter case it is a function)?

Mon, May 11, 2:02 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27396: Represent single-task challenge as multi-task challenge with one task.

might indeed reduce complexity, however,

  • many functions need to be adapted requiring some care
  • behavior is sometimes by purpose different, e.g. there are plot titles with the task name in multi-task challenges while there is none in single task challenges
  • many visualizations apply only to multi-task challenges and trying to use them in single task challenges throws an error, this would be needed to be handled
  • also reports for multi task challenges contain more visualizations which would be uninformative for single task challenges (could however be handled by checking the number of tasks internally)
  • a workaround would be necessary adding a task column to single class challenges (with the same label in every row)
Mon, May 11, 1:59 PM · challengeR (v1.0)

Apr 29 2020

wiesenfa moved T27252: Multiple cases per algorithm are not detected when missing data was added before from In Progress to Backlog on the challengeR (v1.0) board.
Apr 29 2020, 4:03 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27252: Multiple cases per algorithm are not detected when missing data was added before.

ok

Apr 29 2020, 4:03 PM · challengeR (v1.0)

Apr 27 2020

wiesenfa created T27360: compatibility with R4.0.0.
Apr 27 2020, 5:27 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa placed T27287: is warning given if na.treat unspecified in rank-first and obligatory otherwise up for grabs.
Apr 27 2020, 4:25 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27287: is warning given if na.treat unspecified in rank-first and obligatory otherwise.

@eisenman : could you please check whether there is something to be done?

Apr 27 2020, 4:24 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27323: Found bug for report with rankThenAggregate.

can this be closed?

Apr 27 2020, 4:23 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27252: Multiple cases per algorithm are not detected when missing data was added before.

@eisenman: did you take over solving this task? Or should I still do something here?

Apr 27 2020, 4:21 PM · challengeR (v1.0)

Apr 20 2020

wiesenfa added a comment to T27323: Found bug for report with rankThenAggregate.

This is strange. This should normally not happen only if there is a strange package interfering . It is helpful to run sessionInfo() or slightly more detailed devtools::session_info() after a bug happened and report that in the task

Apr 20 2020, 8:55 AM · challengeR (v1.0)

Apr 17 2020

wiesenfa created T27327: warning in docx report.
Apr 17 2020, 2:19 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa created T27326: autolayout networks in multi task report ugly.
Apr 17 2020, 2:14 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa created T27325: Plot titles in rankingHeatmap missing in multi task report.
Apr 17 2020, 2:12 PM · challengeR (v1.0)

Apr 3 2020

wiesenfa created T27294: add multiple figure output formats in report with option clean=TRUE.
Apr 3 2020, 5:06 PM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa created T27291: update license file.
Apr 3 2020, 4:11 PM · challengeR (v1.0)

Apr 2 2020

wiesenfa claimed T27253: Notify user when multi-task data set is interpreted as single-task data set.
Apr 2 2020, 11:32 AM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa created T27288: separate readme.md and readme.Rmd.
Apr 2 2020, 11:32 AM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa created T27287: is warning given if na.treat unspecified in rank-first and obligatory otherwise.
Apr 2 2020, 11:31 AM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa updated subscribers of T27286: interactive plots.
Apr 2 2020, 11:29 AM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa created T27286: interactive plots.
Apr 2 2020, 11:29 AM · challengeR (v1.0)

Mar 27 2020

wiesenfa added a comment to T27241: Readme improvements.

There should be a team section where all of you are acknowledged

Mar 27 2020, 10:48 AM · challengeR (v1.0)
wiesenfa added a comment to T27256: Changes during sanity check can constradict NA handling option.

in my opinion this is a desirable feature

Mar 27 2020, 10:43 AM · challengeR