Change Details

=== Test data === US4DCyl with: - Two static overlapping segmentations: `static_A` and `static_B` - Two dynamic overlapping segmentations in t=1: `dynamic_1_A` and `dynamic_1_B` - One dynamic segmentation in t=2 that theoretically would overlap with dynamic_1_A, if it would be in t=1: `dynamic_2_B` {F2080590} === Issues === - Boolean Operations [] Works with dynamic images but result is static image with infinite bounds. Input of the operation is the current time step - Contour to Image [x] Works at least the the contour test data in MITK-Data but still produces legacy binary image - Image Masking [] Works with dynamic images but does not produce expected masked image most of the time (dynamic_2_B works, dynamic_1_[A,B] produces binary image. [] Does not work with dynamic image and static segmentation even though they have the same time bounds in principle (GUI says "Different image sizes cannot be masked") - Surface to Image [x] Surface selection widget also shows helper objects [] Does not work with dynamic image and static segmentation even though they have the same time bounds in principle (GUI says "Different image sizes cannot be masked") === Summary === View needs a major overhaul. Same for the Multilabel version. Most issues are time-related issues. We may be able to fix the masking output for the upcoming release?

=== Test data === US4DCyl with: - Two static overlapping segmentations: `static_A` and `static_B` - Two dynamic overlapping segmentations in t=1: `dynamic_1_A` and `dynamic_1_B` - One dynamic segmentation in t=2 that theoretically would overlap with dynamic_1_A, if it would be in t=1: `dynamic_2_B` {F2080590} === Issues === - Boolean Operations [] Works with dynamic images but result is static image with infinite bounds. Input of the operation is the current time step - Contour to Image [x] Works at least the the contour test data in MITK-Data but still produces legacy binary image - Image Masking [x] Works with dynamic images but does not produce expected masked image most of the time (dynamic_2_B works, dynamic_1_[A,B] produces binary image. [] Does not work with dynamic image and static segmentation even though they have the same time bounds in principle (GUI says "Different image sizes cannot be masked") - Surface to Image [x] Surface selection widget also shows helper objects [] Does not work with dynamic image and static segmentation even though they have the same time bounds in principle (GUI says "Different image sizes cannot be masked") === Summary === View needs a major overhaul. Same for the Multilabel version. Most issues are time-related issues. We may be able to fix the masking output for the upcoming release?

=== Test data === US4DCyl with: - Two static overlapping segmentations: `static_A` and `static_B` - Two dynamic overlapping segmentations in t=1: `dynamic_1_A` and `dynamic_1_B` - One dynamic segmentation in t=2 that theoretically would overlap with dynamic_1_A, if it would be in t=1: `dynamic_2_B` {F2080590} === Issues === - Boolean Operations [] Works with dynamic images but result is static image with infinite bounds. Input of the operation is the current time step - Contour to Image [x] Works at least the the contour test data in MITK-Data but still produces legacy binary image - Image Masking [x] Works with dynamic images but does not produce expected masked image most of the time (dynamic_2_B works, dynamic_1_[A,B] produces binary image. [] Does not work with dynamic image and static segmentation even though they have the same time bounds in principle (GUI says "Different image sizes cannot be masked") - Surface to Image [x] Surface selection widget also shows helper objects [] Does not work with dynamic image and static segmentation even though they have the same time bounds in principle (GUI says "Different image sizes cannot be masked") === Summary === View needs a major overhaul. Same for the Multilabel version. Most issues are time-related issues. We may be able to fix the masking output for the upcoming release?