Deleted branch from rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30414-MakeIndexDefaultPage.

Pushed new branch to rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30414-MakeIndexDefaultPage.

In the past we used the XLST functionalities from Qt 5 to remove certain parts for the help files. Since Qt 6 we removed the transformation as it is not easy to set up a feasible alternative with libxml for example. The downside now is to have a little bit more clutter in the Help Contents. Since the Help Index still looks like the Help Contents before, I think we should simply change the default view of the Help Perspective to Help Index and live with the Help Contents as-is.

Deleted branch from rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30438-CleanUpHelpAndDoxygenCode.

Pushed new branch to rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30438-CleanUpHelpAndDoxygenCode.

Deleted branch from rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30416-AddUsageHintsToMeasurementView.

Deleted branch from rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30413-FixBlankHelpPages.

Deleted branch from rMITK MITK: bugfix/T29525-IgnoreLabelSetImagesInPixelValueView.

Pushed new branch to rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30413-FixBlankHelpPages.

This is a good idea.

In T30417#258666, @floca wrote:

That you cannot tell. You don't know how testers would react to option A. May be it is equaly irritating to them. And may be they would missing the highlighting of invisible labels if the realy would work with it... 🤔

With a reinit it works but boy is this unintuitive for users. Like when starting the Workbench and opening brain.nrrd, there's no indication that a reinit is necessary (and what a reinit is and where to find it is another story). You can draw a planar figure on it just fine.

Yes, I agree. Well, not completely I guess, since I vote for B. The current state confused all testers (and me at first when I double-checked what's going on, and after I understood I still would consider it a bug in this state). I see the good intentions why you changed it from initial B to something else, but the disadvantages proved to outweigh.

Pushed new branch to rMITK MITK: bugfix/T30416-AddUsageHintsToMeasurementView.

The Measurement view is quite a historically grown abomination that would greatly benefit from a complete overhaul. Hence, to keep complexity down to a minimum for the upcoming release, I suggest to not implement canceling but instead to add a hint to the GUI on how to finish continuous planar figures.

Pushed new branch to rMITK MITK: bugfix/T29525-IgnoreLabelSetImagesInPixelValueView.

For now, I suggest the most simple solution which is to ignore label set images all together, as long as we do not correctly support probing pixel values at a certain location. This is a much more complex problem that can be tackled in the future if requested, for example:

In T30410#258367, @floca wrote:

thanks for the research. Are you already working on that ticket?

This can be also reproduced with just two slices. The crux is to stay at the last drawn contour.

Just checked... yes!

Deleted branch from rMITK MITK: release/T30407-2024-Week-18.

Pushed new branch to rMITK MITK: release/T30407-2024-Week-18.

Deleted branch from rMITK MITK: feature/T30332-ToolBarPresets.