currently, property names do not follow any pattern. It is difficult to find out, which property name is used by which mapper. This should be improved.
Please post all suggestions on how to improve property naming here.
Description
Description
| Status | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | None | T8130 Refurbish property system | ||
| Resolved | None | T12071 Opacity of lines in the measurement bundle cannot be changed | ||
| Resolved | None | T8684 Make a tree out of the property table | ||
| Resolved | None | T2595 Describe recommended property naming scheme |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Seems to be not urgent. Would still be nice to have a consistent naming scheme for 1.0.
Comment Actions
Markus and I don't have time to work on this before the release deadline. Either this will not be done for 1.0, or someone else has to work on it. Marco, please decide and reassign appropriately.
Comment Actions
I removed the RFD keyword: the recommended naming scheme is the "dot" notation. This should be documented somewhere and is probably related to the new property list view.
It is not part of this bug to clean up the whole naming ...
Comment Actions
Resetting all bugs without active assignee flag to "CONFIRMED". Change status to IN_PROGRESS if you are working on it.