Page MenuHomePhabricator

kalali (Amir Kalali)
Developer

Projects (6)

User Details

User Since
Aug 1 2016, 12:10 PM (254 w, 4 d)

Recent Activity

Yesterday

kalali added a comment to T28204: Refactor LevelWindowManagerTest.

We also found out that the current LevelWindowManagerTest fails: https://cdash.mitk.org/testDetails.php?test=774190&build=12215
The problem is the modified LevelWindowManager in combination with the mentioned random tests: The random tests can lead to all nodes having an invalid rendering mode. The LevelWindowManager has been modified in T28250 which conflicts with the current level window manager test.

Fri, Jun 18, 12:16 PM · MITK (v2021.10)

Wed, Jun 16

kalali removed a project from T28464: [Segmentation] New Add/Remove tool: Request for Discussion.
Wed, Jun 16, 1:04 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali updated subscribers of T27154: Define clean workflow for segmentation copying.
Wed, Jun 16, 1:04 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali removed a project from T27154: Define clean workflow for segmentation copying: Request for Discussion.

This is a bigger topic, connected to the refactoring of the segmentation and should be handled in multiple sub-tasks, to split the topic into smaller issues.

Wed, Jun 16, 1:04 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali removed a project from T28181: [Segmentation] Should warning messages be passed on to the UI?: Request for Discussion.

I will start looking into this to give some examples of important warnings / errors that the user should know about.

Wed, Jun 16, 1:02 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali updated subscribers of T28490: Segmentation plugin: "new" segmentation should not run reinit!.

We should look into this and focus on the mentioned related task by @kislinsk to start with separating the two processes:

  1. matching the geometry of the images for interaction
  2. resetting the view of render windows to see the new segmentation
Wed, Jun 16, 12:45 PM · Request for Discussion, Cleared, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28490: Segmentation plugin: "new" segmentation should not run reinit! from Backlog to MITK Meeting on the Request for Discussion board.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:46 AM · Request for Discussion, Cleared, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a project to T28490: Segmentation plugin: "new" segmentation should not run reinit!: Request for Discussion.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:46 AM · Request for Discussion, Cleared, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28548: Allow Zooming during creation of Segmentation. from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:33 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali updated subscribers of T28135: [MultiLabel Segmentation] Utilities view can not handle non-binary multilabel segmentations.

@floca Is this something worth looking into before the refactoring is done? If we stick with LabelSetImages and the basic backend of the utilities, I don't see a reason for this to be postponed.

Wed, Jun 16, 9:08 AM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T28315: [Selection concept] Provide preference page option to show / hide helper nodes.

Maybe an option inside the node selection dialog would work here?

Wed, Jun 16, 9:05 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T26972: Dialog and plugin layout seems to be not shown correctly on laptops.

Is this an issue we need to address? Did anyone else experience this behavior?

Wed, Jun 16, 9:03 AM · MITK (v2021.10), Missing Info
kalali moved T27060: [Segmentation] Rework InterpolationWidget to not depend on data manager view directly from Backlog to MITK Meeting on the Request for Discussion board.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:02 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a project to T27060: [Segmentation] Rework InterpolationWidget to not depend on data manager view directly: Request for Discussion.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:02 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T27060: [Segmentation] Rework InterpolationWidget to not depend on data manager view directly from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:00 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali edited projects for T27060: [Segmentation] Rework InterpolationWidget to not depend on data manager view directly, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:00 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T27149: [Segmentation] Interpolation nodes / position nodes are not correctly hidden from Backlog to MITK Meeting on the Request for Discussion board.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:00 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a project to T27149: [Segmentation] Interpolation nodes / position nodes are not correctly hidden: Request for Discussion.
Wed, Jun 16, 9:00 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28181: [Segmentation] Should warning messages be passed on to the UI? from Backlog to MITK Meeting on the Request for Discussion board.
Wed, Jun 16, 8:57 AM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28113: [Segmentation] LiveWire tool confirms segmentation upon tool or label change from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Wed, Jun 16, 8:56 AM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali edited projects for T28113: [Segmentation] LiveWire tool confirms segmentation upon tool or label change, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
Wed, Jun 16, 8:56 AM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali claimed T28315: [Selection concept] Provide preference page option to show / hide helper nodes.
Wed, Jun 16, 8:53 AM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)

Thu, Jun 10

kalali closed T26878: Opacity / transparency of a data node cannot be changed anymore as Resolved.

I will close this for now as the issue cannot be reproduced.

Thu, Jun 10, 2:20 PM · MITK
kalali added a subtask for T28176: [Segmentation] Inspection of module and plugin: T26959: [Segmentation] Newly created LabelSet segmentation is not displayed as "outline binary".
Thu, Jun 10, 2:17 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a parent task for T26959: [Segmentation] Newly created LabelSet segmentation is not displayed as "outline binary": T28176: [Segmentation] Inspection of module and plugin.
Thu, Jun 10, 2:17 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali renamed T26959: [Segmentation] Newly created LabelSet segmentation is not displayed as "outline binary" from Newly created LabelSet segmentation is not displayed as "outline binary" to [Segmentation] Newly created LabelSet segmentation is not displayed as "outline binary".
Thu, Jun 10, 2:16 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T26959: [Segmentation] Newly created LabelSet segmentation is not displayed as "outline binary" from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Thu, Jun 10, 2:16 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali edited projects for T26959: [Segmentation] Newly created LabelSet segmentation is not displayed as "outline binary", added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
Thu, Jun 10, 2:16 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T27133: [Segmentation] Is QmitkDataSelectionWidget needed anymore? from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Thu, Jun 10, 2:12 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali renamed T27133: [Segmentation] Is QmitkDataSelectionWidget needed anymore? from Is QmitkDataSelectionWidget needed anymore? to [Segmentation] Is QmitkDataSelectionWidget needed anymore?.
Thu, Jun 10, 2:12 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali edited projects for T27133: [Segmentation] Is QmitkDataSelectionWidget needed anymore?, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
Thu, Jun 10, 2:11 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T27154: Define clean workflow for segmentation copying from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Thu, Jun 10, 2:10 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T27154: Define clean workflow for segmentation copying from Backlog to MITK Meeting on the Request for Discussion board.

No further work has been done here but I would like to keep this topic in mind when refactoring the segmentation modules.

Thu, Jun 10, 2:10 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T27665: PlanarFigure tests show error with DICOMTagsOfInterestAddHelper.

@floca I can't reproduce this anymore. However, I'm not sure where some changes were done. Do you have an idea?

Thu, Jun 10, 2:07 PM · Restricted Project, MITK
kalali edited projects for T25804: Set 'selected' property when using the new selection concept, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
Thu, Jun 10, 1:29 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Request for Discussion
kalali edited projects for T24738: Thumbnail preview of images for datastorage inspectors, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
Thu, Jun 10, 1:27 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali edited projects for T28315: [Selection concept] Provide preference page option to show / hide helper nodes, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
Thu, Jun 10, 1:25 PM · Request for Discussion, MITK (v2021.10)

Wed, Jun 2

kalali removed a project from T27506: Extend checklists for segmentation view: Restricted Project.
Wed, Jun 2, 1:38 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Cleared

May 19 2021

kalali moved T28490: Segmentation plugin: "new" segmentation should not run reinit! from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
May 19 2021, 11:51 AM · Request for Discussion, Cleared, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali triaged T28490: Segmentation plugin: "new" segmentation should not run reinit! as High priority.

I agree on that. I had some problems with that with the new mxn-multiwidget. The topic was also mentioned in T27613: Improve reinit behavior.

May 19 2021, 11:51 AM · Request for Discussion, Cleared, MITK (v2021.10)

May 11 2021

kalali added a comment to T28204: Refactor LevelWindowManagerTest.

So I modified the "Assert"-functions to directly encapsule the CPPUNIT_ASSERT_MESSAGE calls in that function as you suggested. The error still occurs and now the problem is that I can't see where the error occurs because it happens inside the "Assert"-function (which is the same for each test). So that is not an option. Any other suggestions? I could split the test to test each node individually.

May 11 2021, 2:08 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T28204: Refactor LevelWindowManagerTest.

Ok so I found a bug for the test in line 320. This showed some complex behavior with the level window manager, which I don't want to address here.
However, the test in line 288 still randomly fails - when debugging in that line the test does not fail but fails in line 292.

May 11 2021, 12:26 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T28204: Refactor LevelWindowManagerTest.

Yes, I agree that this is not the most straight forward way to do it. There was a reasoning behind it to do it that way.
I will think about it - but currently it seems as if something is not correct with the tests, in a way that I am actually expecting wrong test results - so I need to rethink the expected results and change the true / false arguments accordingly.

May 11 2021, 10:58 AM · MITK (v2021.10)

May 10 2021

kalali added a comment to T28204: Refactor LevelWindowManagerTest.

Since I modified and merged T28250 I wanted to continue here. I still get failed tests in line 288 and in line 320:

assertion failed
- Expression: AssertImageForLevelWindowProperty(false, true, false)
- "imageForLevelWindow" property not correctly set
assertion failed
- Expression: AssertImageForLevelWindowProperty(true, false, false)
- "imageForLevelWindow" property not correctly set
May 10 2021, 4:21 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28204: Refactor LevelWindowManagerTest from Backlog to Cycle on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
May 10 2021, 11:00 AM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali edited projects for T28204: Refactor LevelWindowManagerTest, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed MITK.
May 10 2021, 11:00 AM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali closed T28250: [LevelWindowManager] Different behavior in AutoTopMost case and fallback case as Resolved.
May 10 2021, 10:36 AM · Breaking Change, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali committed rMITKbe464bfe51da: T28250 Level window manager update function not consistent (authored by kalali).
T28250 Level window manager update function not consistent
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITKebf8757b2828: Make protected members private; remove comments (authored by kalali).
Make protected members private; remove comments
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITK9751f1d41d9c: Use return early to simplify the code structure (authored by kalali).
Use return early to simplify the code structure
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITK1d0306cddd48: Rename vector of data nodes (authored by kalali).
Rename vector of data nodes
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITK1ea1daa42d05: Use "auto" to simplify the code (authored by kalali).
Use "auto" to simplify the code
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITKc1756ccd4526: Remove "levelwindow"-property check (authored by kalali).
Remove "levelwindow"-property check
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITK135694ca36ca: Rename function and invert logic (authored by kalali).
Rename function and invert logic
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITKbcbe13e0349f: Clean class and function (authored by kalali).
Clean class and function
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITKe69fa735b71b: Refactor function names and parameters (authored by kalali).
Refactor function names and parameters
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM
kalali committed rMITK27cfe7f01ba4: Clean comments and remove unnecessary comments (authored by kalali).
Clean comments and remove unnecessary comments
May 10 2021, 10:35 AM

May 7 2021

kalali updated subscribers of T28320: [Segmentation] Region growing does not work if seed point is already inside a segmentation.

I quickly modified the code to see if this works potentially. For this I set m_PaintingPixelValue to 1 for both cases and used the OnMousePressedOutside-function also for a mouse pressed inside:

m_PaintingPixelValue = inside ? 1 : 1;
May 7 2021, 2:38 PM · Missing Info, MITK (v2021.10), Request for Discussion
kalali added a comment to T28320: [Segmentation] Region growing does not work if seed point is already inside a segmentation.

I started looking into this and what I found inside mitk::RegionGrowingTool::OnMousePressed:

if (inside)
      {
        MITK_DEBUG << "Clicked inside segmentation";
        // For now, we're doing nothing when the user clicks inside the segmentation. Behaviour can be implemented via
        // OnMousePressedInside()
        // When you do, be sure to remove the m_PaintingPixelValue check in OnMouseMoved() and OnMouseReleased()
        return;
      }
      else
      {
        MITK_DEBUG << "Clicked outside of segmentation";
        OnMousePressedOutside(nullptr, interactionEvent);
      }

Looking at the file history it doesn't look like that was implemented in MITK at anytime.
So we can actually discuss if we want to allow such a functionality and if, what the obstacles are.

May 7 2021, 2:29 PM · Missing Info, MITK (v2021.10), Request for Discussion

May 6 2021

kalali added a project to T28250: [LevelWindowManager] Different behavior in AutoTopMost case and fallback case: Breaking Change.
IMPORTANT: ClearPropObserverLists has been renamed to ClearPropertyObserverMaps; CreatePropObserverLists has been renamed to CreatePropertyObserverMaps; IgnoreNode has been renamed to HasLevelWindowRenderingMode
May 6 2021, 3:51 PM · Breaking Change, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali updated the task description for T26754: Review checklists.
May 6 2021, 2:16 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali closed T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources, a subtask of T26754: Review checklists, as Resolved.
May 6 2021, 2:12 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali closed T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources as Resolved.

Obviously it was not clear what we are expecting here so I will close this task and refer to two new tasks for the specific topics mentioned here:

May 6 2021, 2:12 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali added a subtask for T26754: Review checklists: T28481: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available user test data.
May 6 2021, 2:11 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali added a parent task for T28481: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available user test data: T26754: Review checklists.
May 6 2021, 2:11 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28481: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available user test data from Backlog to Cycle on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
May 6 2021, 2:11 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali triaged T28481: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available user test data as Normal priority.
May 6 2021, 2:11 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a subtask for T26754: Review checklists: T28480: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available location to store user test data.
May 6 2021, 2:10 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali added a parent task for T28480: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available location to store user test data: T26754: Review checklists.
May 6 2021, 2:10 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28480: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available location to store user test data from Backlog to Cycle on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
May 6 2021, 2:10 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali triaged T28480: [Checklist] [Test data] Define publicly available location to store user test data as Normal priority.
May 6 2021, 2:07 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali moved T28479: [Segmentation] Rethink / reevaluate our existing segmentation tools / algorithms from Backlog to Segmentation on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
May 6 2021, 1:12 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali triaged T28479: [Segmentation] Rethink / reevaluate our existing segmentation tools / algorithms as High priority.
May 6 2021, 10:48 AM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali created T28479: [Segmentation] Rethink / reevaluate our existing segmentation tools / algorithms.
May 6 2021, 10:48 AM · MITK (v2021.10)

May 5 2021

kalali added a comment to T27507: Check the current behavior of the segmentation tools according static and dynamic 4D segmentation.

@floca I could only find two tasks mentioned here that are not closed, T27872 and T27684, but they are unrelated to the task description. Can this task be closed?

May 5 2021, 1:48 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Missing Info, Restricted Project

May 4 2021

kalali added a comment to T28131: [MultiLabel Segmentation] 3D Threshold tool does not work with multiple labels / layers.

Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that you or someone "verschlimmbesserte" anything :D I understand and appreciate all the effort that has been made by you.
I am more thinking of a different approach architecture wise - you already mentioned "abstraction levels". For me it seems as if different classes and functions are on the same "level" of doing something but they do it differently - which makes it even harder to grasp the logic behind it. That's why I mentioned "class diagrams". Also, often classes and functions are way too overloaded (e.g. SegTool2D) with way too many responsibilities.

May 4 2021, 6:46 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T28131: [MultiLabel Segmentation] 3D Threshold tool does not work with multiple labels / layers.

Ok I have to admit: The whole code base that is related to this topic is totally unclear to me and I find it very hard to understand what is going on. I don't know why the code is like that but I would highly suggest to simplify and clean the relevant classes and functions as much as possible before it becomes problematic (e.g. more complex cases with 4D-dynamic segmentations with multi-layer multi-label segmentation masks or similar). Also, I highly doubt that this is future proof when it comes to changes in the following years so as already mentioned in my last comment: I think we really need to discuss this topic - maybe it helps to have a clearer picture by creating (class) diagrams with relations etc.

May 4 2021, 1:58 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T28131: [MultiLabel Segmentation] 3D Threshold tool does not work with multiple labels / layers.

Thanks for the clarification. I will look into the FeedbackCntourTool and ContourModelUtils and see if I can make sense of all this :D
Depending on what I find out I think we should really talk about the future of the (multilabel) segmentation modules / plugins and how we can simplify the code base (generalize it) and remove redundancy as well as decouple classes etc.

May 4 2021, 11:41 AM · MITK (v2021.10)

May 3 2021

kalali edited projects for T28294: [Documentation] std multiwidget does show a blank page on F1, added: MITK (v2021.10), Missing Info; removed Next Milestone, MITK.

I am not sure what is exactly done here to reproduce. To get any help page I have to click on a plugin anyway. How would I provoke a blank page?
When I use F1 while the Standard Display is activated I get a blank page for the Standard Display. If that's what is meant than we need to reconsider how to display this specific help page: There is a description of the "four window view" inside src\Plugins\org.mitk.gui.qt.ext\documentation\UserManual\MITKUserManual.dox but we can not move it to the stdmultiwidgeteditor-plugin as it contains more information about the workbench, not only about the standard display.

May 3 2021, 4:37 PM · Missing Info, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a comment to T28206: Renaming segmentation or planar figure based ROI nodes breaks histogram.

I tried to reproduce this issue and found the following:
With the changes in T28211 @floca mentioned, there is no legend anymore m_Controls.chartWidget->SetShowLegend(false);
Showing this legend again displays "histogram" as the label name - not even the original segmentation node name. Now when I add another segmentation and add it to the statistics, the histogram is completely removed (it's calculated but the widget does not provide any space for the histogram anymore).

May 3 2021, 4:19 PM · MITK, Next Milestone
kalali added a comment to T28131: [MultiLabel Segmentation] 3D Threshold tool does not work with multiple labels / layers.

@floca I sarted looking into this and found out the following:
The threshold tool used is QmitkBinaryThresholdToolGUIBase, which is a subclass of QmitkAutoSegmentationToolGUIBase. This class uses the AutoSegmentationTool, a subclass of the mitkTool. As far as I can see the target node that will be connected with this tool upon activating the tool is done inside mitk::AutoSegmentationTool::GetTargetSegmentationNode().
However, there is no information about any layer or even the information that this can be used with multilabel segmentation nodes.

May 3 2021, 2:47 PM · MITK (v2021.10)
kalali claimed T28250: [LevelWindowManager] Different behavior in AutoTopMost case and fallback case.
May 3 2021, 12:58 PM · Breaking Change, MITK (v2021.10)
kalali added a revision to T28250: [LevelWindowManager] Different behavior in AutoTopMost case and fallback case: Unknown Object (Differential Revision).
May 3 2021, 12:56 PM · Breaking Change, MITK (v2021.10)

Apr 23 2021

kalali moved T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe from Doing to Backlog on the MatchPoint board.
Apr 23 2021, 2:50 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali moved T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe from Restricted Project Column to Restricted Project Column on the Restricted Project board.
Apr 23 2021, 2:50 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali placed T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe up for grabs.

I will put this up for grabs as it does not make sense to start a new project now. Personally I will investigate further after the Conan evaluation report has been written.

Apr 23 2021, 2:50 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali added a comment to T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe.

One long term solution would also be to create an own Litmus Conan recipe and use this external Litmus package inside MatchPoint.

Apr 23 2021, 1:24 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali added a comment to T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe.

I was trying to test if I can forward the ITK_USE_FILE variable inside the ExternalProject call to Litmus, as we did in the change for the CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH. I realized that neither the CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH nor the ITK_USE_FILE is correctly forwarded and accessible inside Litmus CMake configuration.

Apr 23 2021, 1:13 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali moved T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe from Backlog to Doing on the MatchPoint board.
Apr 23 2021, 12:08 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali moved T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe from Restricted Project Column to Restricted Project Column on the Restricted Project board.
Apr 23 2021, 12:07 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali added a comment to T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe.

I started looking into this and some changes need to be made in order to get some errors out of the way:

  • Conan-center recipes are built without CMake find / config files, as mentioned here: In short: Conan creates own find / config files so they are removed from the original package.
Apr 23 2021, 12:07 PM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project
kalali triaged T28462: [Conan] Build MatchPoint with ITK 5.1.0 recipe as Normal priority.
Apr 23 2021, 10:20 AM · MatchPoint, Restricted Project

Apr 22 2021

kalali moved T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources from Tests/Checklists to Cycle on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Apr 22 2021, 12:18 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali raised the priority of T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources from Normal to High.

I set the priority to high because we defined that having appropriate data at a reachable location is one of the most pressing issues when it comes to manual GUI tests.

Apr 22 2021, 12:11 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali added a parent task for T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources: T26754: Review checklists.
Apr 22 2021, 12:06 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali added a subtask for T26754: Review checklists: T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources.
Apr 22 2021, 12:06 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali moved T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources from Backlog to Tests/Checklists on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Apr 22 2021, 12:06 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali edited projects for T26989: [Checklist] GUI test data originates from different sources, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed Request for Discussion, MITK.
Apr 22 2021, 12:06 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali moved T26754: Review checklists from Backlog to Tests/Checklists on the MITK (v2021.10) board.
Apr 22 2021, 12:05 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project
kalali edited projects for T26754: Review checklists, added: MITK (v2021.10); removed Next Milestone.
Apr 22 2021, 12:05 PM · MITK (v2021.10), Restricted Project